22 Dec 2005
FIONA PRASAD V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CA CA119/04
- Citation
- openlaw-2da5f972_b784_474a_9a21_5dfea3d023e3.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Only the portion of payments that are referable to the part of the premises actually occupied as the applicant's home constitute 'accommodation costs' under s 61E; where a property comprises both a home and a rental unit global costs must be apportioned on an equitable basis and the Chief Executive's apportionment was lawful.