4 Oct 2006
LESA SYSTEMS LIMITED HC CHCH CIV 2006-409-624
- Citation
- openlaw-0cc54fc4_5487_415a_940d_c1ec2276f901.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The presumption in Rule 476C was not rebutted because the proceedings were mispleaded and always unlikely to succeed; therefore costs are payable to the defendant and an increase to the 2C scale under Rule 48C is appropriate; indemnity costs are declined but a certificate for second counsel and disbursements for travel and accommodation for two counsel are ordered.