30 Mar 2023
MAO v INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED [2023] NZHC 673
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 673
- Court
- High Court
Leave to continue was declined because the proceeding fell within the scope of an extended prevention order under s166, was an attempt to relitigate matters already struck out, lacked reasonable merit (would be amenable to strike out), and sought relief outside the Court's jurisdiction regarding enforcement in China; accordingly it was an abuse of process and the application for leave was refused.