27 Jul 2009
PRASAD V INDIANA PUBLICATIONS (NZ) LTD AND ORS HC AK CIV-2009-404-0856
- Citation
- openlaw-44d6c58f_8e55_423b_b2ac_19c0bd5e20f0.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Defendants established to the required summary judgment standard that Mr Prasad was a privy of SGL and thus bound by the District Court judgment; however defendants failed to prove that the District Court decision covered the same temporal scope of alleged infringements relied on by Mr Prasad in this proceeding, so summary judgment for defendants could not be granted; plaintiff's summary judgment application failed for non-compliance with Rule 12.4(5)(b).