3 Feb 2009
FOX AND ANOR V CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL AND ORS HC CHCH CIV-2008-409-000898
- Citation
- openlaw-195ce367_175b_47f7_9d69_318969785fe9.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for costs was dismissed and costs were to lie where they fell because the appellants were largely unsuccessful on the substantive issues, the sole successful ground was very late in formulation, and allegations of wrongdoing by the second respondent were not established.