24 Aug 2018
WOODS v NZ POLICE [2018] NZHC 2189
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 2189
- Court
- High Court
The challenged conditions were lawful: the curfew and electronic monitoring did not amount to a s 33 residential restriction because the appellant was not subject to all s 33(2) requirements; all challenged conditions exhibited a rational nexus to the purposes in s 93(3), and were necessary and proportional given the appellant's high risk and rehabilitative needs; the programme condition fell within s 15(3)(b)/s16 as a permissible placement and aimed to facilitate rehabilitation and reintegration.