3 Jul 2018
LISTON v THE DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS [2018] NZHC 1615
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1615
- Court
- High Court
Recall denied because no new relevant law or omitted authoritative decision was shown, no new facts that would meet the test for leave were produced, the Tribunal had considered the original media article and anticipated further publicity, and the applicant failed to demonstrate he was taken by surprise; the original Whanganui Chronicle article may be admitted but the other post‑decision articles are excluded.