11 Oct 2019
HOUGHTON v SAUNDERS [2019] NZCA 506
- Citation
- [2019] NZCA 506
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The appeal was dismissed: the Court held the parts of Mr Houston's initial report addressing the FY05 projection and the entirety of his supplementary report were inadmissible because they sought to rely on factual premises inconsistent with stage one findings and were not 'substantially helpful' under s25 Evidence Act; the High Court's discovery directions were proper case management and the alternative security for costs orders were not overturned.