19 Jun 2012
CHAPMAN V WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL HC AK CIV 2011-404-3822
- Citation
- openlaw-5e0c14d6_e1f0_4cae_b261_68531fc93c03.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The claim as pleaded could not be characterised as a provable debt at the time of Chapman’s adjudication or discharge because the cause of action for the alleged negligent building work had not accrued (was not reasonably discoverable) before discharge; accordingly the Tribunal did not err in refusing removal and judicial review is dismissed.