9 Dec 2009
WILFRED ROYCE LANE V QUESTNET LTD CA CA344/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-0402a089_4c69_4f46_bab7_06efb76946eb.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court held that s 6(1)(c) was satisfied by notice of the Hong Kong proceedings as a whole and the appellant had actual notice of the hearing; enforcement of the Hong Kong default judgment did not offend New Zealand public policy under s 6(1)(e); and the s 7(1) discretion to adjourn should not be exercised given lack of obvious appeal merit, prior consideration by Hong Kong courts and delays — accordingly the appeal is dismissed and registration of the Hong Kong judgment stands.