21 Jul 2016
FANG v THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2016] NZHC 1630
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1630
- Court
- High Court
A decision in the form of listing the international obligations and placing the record of personal circumstances (as in Babulal and affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Singh) satisfies s177(5); given the statutory prohibition on an obligation to give reasons and the limited scope of review, the challenged decision raised no error of law, was not Wednesbury unreasonable, did not breach NZBORA s27 and did not breach legitimate expectation; application dismissed.