6 Jul 2009
FOSTER V THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT HC CIV 2008-485-2395
- Citation
- openlaw-6130fc41_2090_488c_bc40_a969cc29d379.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Time to file was enlarged because the applicant acted without legal advice and reasonably misunderstood procedure, but leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to raise any question of law of general or public importance and his complaint about benefit adequacy is not justiciable; the decision to provide a recoverable advance rather than a non-recoverable grant involved no error of law.