6 May 2022
AR (INDIA) v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2022] NZSC 55
- Citation
- [2022] NZSC 55
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the central s 8 claim could not succeed on the facts regardless of its legal scope, the risk to life issue was already authoritatively determined by prior Tribunal and High Court findings so relitigation would be abuse of process, the proposed statutory duty claim was not raised below and could be pursued in new proceedings, and the additional Tikanga Māori argument was not particularised; extension of time and counsel leave were granted.