25 Sept 2017
FRANCISC CATALIN DELIU v THE NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE AND THE AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE NO. 1 OF THE NZ LAW SOCIETY [2017] NZHC 2318
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 2318
- Court
- High Court
Freedom of expression did not protect repetitive, intemperate and unfounded allegations against judges that undermined public confidence; the appellant's conduct occurred while providing regulated services under s7(1)(a) or work connected to such services; no absolute or qualified privilege applied to defeat disciplinary charges; judicial criticisms could be admitted under s239 for weight assessment; evidence sufficed on balance of probabilities; 15 months' suspension and specified costs were a proportionate response and within statutory powers.