11 Jun 2010
ASHLEY AND COLHURST V ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION HC WN CIV-2009-485-1669
- Citation
- openlaw-a7bfe011_281b_4de3_b56e_cfe84891b35d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave refused because the dispute was essentially factual; the High Court found ACC had complied with the Treatment Regulations (including proper nomination under reg 18) and that the appellants were presented with an informed real choice; no arguable question of law of sufficient importance existed to justify leave under s163.