22 Oct 2020
POROS v BAX [2020] NZHC 2769
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 2769
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was declined because the proposed appeal did not raise any question of law or fact of sufficient importance that would justify a second appeal; the challenges amounted to re‑runs of concurrent factual findings and mathematical adjustments without demonstrating significant legal error or need for clarification of law.