21 Oct 2009
TODD POHOKURA LIMITED V SHELL EXPLORATION NZ LIMITED AND ANOR HC WN CIV-2006-485-1600
- Citation
- openlaw-f01d3248_7559_42fd_b4c3_4fae65db3172.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court concluded that most of the contested material was relevant and reasonably discoverable under r8.24: the bulk of redactions in RM.157.002 could not be sustained (with narrowly specified exceptions); detailed McKee/Mangahewa production and decision‑making documents and related group documents are relevant to testing Todd's liability and damages case; prior refusal under the former r300 does not preclude fresh orders under r8.24; protective measures can address commercial sensitivity.