17 Jun 2011
WAIKATO-TAINUI TE KAUHANGANUI INCORPORATED V TANIA ERIS MARTIN HC HAM CIV-2011-419-796
- Citation
- openlaw-04f8c9ae_d10e_4128_b7f7_5d5201c64fe2.pdf
- Court
- High Court
There was a strong arguable case that the 13 May notice was defective and the 3 June notice did not comply with the 21-day requirement; the proposed removal resolution was prima facie invalid due to rule ambiguity and the requirement for a special resolution; balance of convenience and risk of unlawful proceedings justified interim restraint of the meeting until valid notice and proper procedure were given.