19 Jul 2010
EASTBAY & GLEN INNES MEDICAL CENTRE LIMITED AND ANOR V O'HANLON ENTERPRISES LIMITED HC AK CIV-2009-404-8112
- Citation
- openlaw-e50aea4a_a2dd_408f_9eb5_d7934322c4aa.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the dispute is a private contractual interpretation of an unusually worded repainting clause, the financial stakes (roughly $9,000 additional repainting costs) are modest compared with the litigation costs already incurred (nearly $17,000) and the issue lacks sufficient public importance to justify the cost and delay of a further appeal under the s 67 test.