22 Sept 2015
STYLO MEDICAL SERVICES LTD v HUM HOSPITALITY LTD [2015] NZHC 2297
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2297
- Court
- High Court
Given the mixed outcomes and conduct of the parties, costs should lie where they fall for the two cancellation applications because Hum achieved substantial remediation and relief was an indulgence, but Stylo succeeds on the stay application which was misconceived; accordingly no costs order for the cancellation applications and a 2B costs award of $1990 plus disbursements to Stylo for the stay application is appropriate.