27 Mar 2012
CURTIS V GIBSON COA CA368/2010
- Citation
- COA CA368/2010
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The recall application was dismissed because no proper basis for recall was established: both respondents were parties and represented on appeal; the second respondent could have benefited from the contested dealings; and the costs order against both respondents was justified under rr 53 and 53A of the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005.