23 Jul 2014
MATHIESEN v HODGES [2014] NZHC 1722
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 1722
- Court
- High Court
The Court held that recusal was not required to make interlocutory procedural orders despite the Judge's historical partnership with the creditor's solicitor; the Judge made procedural directions, left substantive questions (including any annulment or contempt determinations) to another Judge, and reserved costs.