29 Apr 2020
PERCY & ANOR v PERCY & ORS [2020] NZHC 828
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 828
- Court
- High Court
The application for a prospective costs order was dismissed because this is a Buckton category 3 (hostile) case and the plaintiffs did not establish the exceptional circumstances or strength of case necessary to justify a PCO; removal of trustees was identified as appropriate on grounds of conflict and dysfunction but personal liability for costs was not justified; costs of this interlocutory application were reserved to the trial judge.