10 Aug 2006
PATEL V GOVAN CA CA133/05
- Citation
- openlaw-f536d792_d170_4e17_bd53_e483f3332aef.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Associate Judge properly exercised his r 12 discretion to rescind and correct the sealed orders because the sealed orders went beyond the orders he had decided to make on 9 June 2005; an applicant cannot convert judicial reasoning into unrequested orders by sealing a draft without giving notice to the other party or the judge, and summary judgment applicants must specify the orders sought under r 138(4)(b) and Form 19.