14 Oct 2008
SHARMA V WATI HC AK CIV-2006-404-2976
- Citation
- openlaw-10b3d3d4_323f_4f0c_9331_412e0d3dc932.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application was misconceived because no taxation by a Registrar had occurred; reserved interlocutory costs require express judicial determination and, where included in a sealed judgment without such determination, the correct remedy is an application for recall of judgment to the trial judge; accordingly the review and extension applications are dismissed.