14 Jul 2014
GREENSLADE & ORS V HONEYMOON BAY HOLDINGS LIMITED CA39/2013 [2014] NZCA 315 [14 July 2014]
- Citation
- [2014] NZCA 315
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court held the lot was not landlocked because the combined sea and pedestrian access was, on the facts, reasonable for permitted use; alternatively, even if access were marginal, relief was denied because the appellants knew the access situation when purchasing, failed to negotiate in good faith, had potential alternative access via the Ryder right of way, and had not demonstrated that hardship or compensation considerations required ordering vehicular access over HBH's driveway.