15 Nov 2006
RAPLEY AND ANOR V RAPLEY HC DUN CIV-2006-412-000397
- Citation
- openlaw-e5cf6219_a383_4b10_91c1_07aa53ccd89f.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Court exercised its discretion to award a modest costs sum against the respondent because, although the respondent did not oppose the order for sale and raised welfare concerns, he delayed responding and negotiations; given family context and shared responsibility the court declined the larger claimed costs and ordered $2500 payable by the respondent from his share of sale proceeds with disbursements shared equally by the three trustees.