14 Jun 2010
ROGERS AND RUTHERFORD V SOLOMON PROPERTIES LIMITED HC AK CIV 2010-404-000815
- Citation
- openlaw-5c8d52bf_47fa_4096_92e2_0c3456c8647e.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for a stay of advertising was dismissed because the plaintiff demonstrated a strong prima facie case that Solomon remained jointly and severally liable for the invoice: evidence included the Deed of Novation with a guarantee, continued correspondence on Solomon letterhead, the authorised stamp/signature on the invoice, dealings with vendors, and Solomon's failure to file a responsive affidavit; these facts meant there was no genuine dispute warranting a stay.