New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Review remittal

Legal area

Court

19 Sept 2001

Nansen v Accident Compensation Corporation

Citation

[2001] NZACC 266
Court

District Court

The application for leave was dismissed because the issues the appellant proposed to argue depended on evidence not adduced at the earlier hearing and therefore did not show any arguable error of law under s165; statutory remedies under s159 and s164 were available for fresh evidence or remittal.
18 Jul 1997

Hanham & Philp Contractors Limited v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Citation

[1997] NZACC 150
Court

District Court

The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to the Review Officer because the available medical evidence was insufficiently clear to determine, on the balance of probabilities, whether the 5 May 1992 accident produced an injury causing costs attributable to the appellant; further clear medical opinion is required before final classification and attribution and any premium loading determination.