11 Jun 2010
FALOON AND ORS V THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE HC TAU CIV 2009-470-885
- Citation
- openlaw-2c189f7d_7fe0_4a19_acb8_ed639bc94ca6.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The applicants failed to serve the Rule 2.3 review application within the prescribed time and provided no adequate explanation for the service delay; the application lacked merit and amounted to an attempt to relitigate matters already finally dealt with, so no extension of time should be granted, the review is dismissed and the defendant is entitled to costs of $750.