20 Apr 2007
AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED V DAVID MCALISTER CA CA278/06
- Citation
- openlaw-0c9de59f_4500_4c46_acfd_bb9a73da61e7.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Leave to appeal was granted because the proper interpretation of 'by reason directly or indirectly of' in s 104(1) ERA is a question of law of general and public importance; the Court identified discrete subsidiary legal questions concerning evidence, comparator group, and the applicability of s 30 Human Rights Act 1993 to be determined on appeal.