21 Mar 2023
JAMES HAY WALLACE v R [2023] NZSC 24
- Citation
- [2023] NZSC 24
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the timing discrepancy arising from the s 9 statement raised essentially a factual credibility issue that did not create a real risk of miscarriage given the broader circumstantial evidence supporting conviction; the sentence and uplift were orthodox and not manifestly excessive, and bail was consequently refused.