30 Aug 2012
SEATING SYSTEMS LIMITED V KIDSON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED HC NEL CIV-2012-442-000013
- Citation
- openlaw-d0d94ba6_7028_4e8c_a1e5_8770f4b0f5d1.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The 8 July 2011 email did not satisfy s 21 because it did not indicate a scheduled amount or provide full and unequivocal notice of differences; therefore s 22 made the claimed amount payable and s 23 permitted recovery as a debt; accordingly the statutory demand was not set aside and the application was dismissed with an extension of time for payment and directions on costs.