2 Apr 2014
GFM v JAM [2014] NZSC 32
- Citation
- [2014] NZFLR 599
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal dismissed because the appeal raised no question of general or public importance and the Court of Appeal correctly applied the applicable principles (including s 2G(2) and authority in Burgess v Beaven) and made concurrent factual findings justifying valuation at the date of hearing and rejecting application of s 18C on the facts.