8 Oct 2021
MEADS v MULDREW [2021] NZHC 2691
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 2691
- Court
- High Court
Dismissed the stay application because the appellant no longer sought a stay, there was no evidence the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent a stay, the costs award was effectively offset by amounts already owing under the substantive Family Court judgment and prior costs awards, and the balance of convenience weighed against a stay; alternative interim orders including a payment plan or removal of s 42 notices were inappropriate because no basis for court-ordered compromise or removal arose on this application.