9 Dec 2009
WILFRED ROYCE LANE V QUESTNET LTD CA CA344/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-12059118_67bf_45a2_b511_95e9dfe29b0f.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Notice of institution of proceedings in the foreign Court was sufficient under s 6(1)(c); the substituted service and circumstances gave the appellant adequate opportunity to defend; enforcement did not offend New Zealand public policy under s 6(1)(e); and the Court properly declined to adjourn under s 7(1) because the Hong Kong appeal lacked obvious merit, there were delays and considerations of comity weighed against adjournment.