25 May 1998
Saunders v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1998] NZACC 113
- Court
- District Court
Appellant did not intentionally contribute to the overpayment and received the payments in good faith; given his financial circumstances, ongoing legal liabilities, limited liquid income, and the fact the overpayment was used for living expenses, it would be inequitable under s.77(2) to require repayment; accordingly the debt is remitted and the overpayment cancelled.