30 Jun 2010
PAUL YU PO CHEN AND ANOR V LIMIN YANG AND YANG (JASMINE) LIU AND ORS CA CA343/2010
- Citation
- openlaw-7d72bebb_0d73_44cf_bc5e_b878e294410b.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The High Court judge did not err in principle or exercise his discretion wrongly in refusing video‑link evidence: admitting the witness would not preserve fairness given his lack of legal advice and awareness of the case, language and translation difficulties, credibility assessment problems from interpreter and video evidence, and the lateness of the application caused by the appellants' delay; therefore the refusal was within acceptable judicial discretion and not plainly wrong.