12 Aug 2010
MHS V PIW HC NWP CIV-2010-443-000292
- Citation
- openlaw-34a2fed6_8983_40c1_8d2a_9c29e2916a82.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The High Court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to establish either acquiescence by the respondent or that returning the child to Australia would expose him to a grave risk of psychological harm or place him in an intolerable situation; Australian legal mechanisms and authorities were capable of addressing the issues, and the delay in filing was not shown to be attributable to the respondent.