17 May 2017
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE v JACKSON PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED [2017] NZHC 1014
- Citation
- [2017]NZCCLR 30
- Court
- High Court
The Court found the Commissioner had standing as a prospective creditor with leave to proceed because there was a real prospect the Commissioner's asserted tax adjustments would prevail; the NOPA was not treated as an all-purpose conclusive disputable decision that prevented the Court addressing interim consequences, but the Commissioner lawfully withheld post-NOPA refunds under s46 so those could not be relied on for set-off. Critically, the company persistently and seriously failed to keep adequate accounting records (s194) and Stuart Jackson exercised control as a shadow/de facto director…