30 Apr 2018
YOUNG v BODY CORPORATE 85659 [2018] NZHC 849
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 849
- Court
- High Court
Applicants lacked standing under s 210 because they were ineligible to vote due to unpaid levies; alternatively, even if standing existed, the resolutions were not unjust or inequitable: the Body Corporate reasonably treated podium window replacement as part of long-term maintenance, had legitimate reasons to retain Armstrong Downes without a new tender, s 126 did not yet operate to reallocate costs, no material breach of regulation 17, no breach of legitimate expectation or natural justice, and no improper purpose was shown.