17 Apr 2007
HAMMOND V HARDY HC AK CIV 2006-404-4894
- Citation
- openlaw-81654977_9dfb_4c1d_b2f9_1579e0c0924e.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The commercial building was not used 'wholly or principally for the purposes of the household' and remained the respondent's separate property; the residential building alone constituted the family home/homestead and the mortgage debt was properly apportioned by the valuation split to attribute the relationship share; there was insufficient prospective evidence to satisfy s15, s32, s26 or s26A thresholds; discretionary s18B adjustments were correctly exercised; appeal dismissed.