27 Sept 2010
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND V MICHAEL ANDREW SWANN AND ORS HC DUN CIV-2009-412-000213
- Citation
- openlaw-7d9f1960_507f_4abb_ac50_5d4832023c92.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court exercised its r11.9 discretion to recall and amend its substantive judgment to correct identifiable errors and omissions in the property schedule and paragraph [85]; specific corrections were made so that asset categorizations (forfeited or available to meet the pecuniary penalty) accurately reflect vesting and s29(3) directions, and the amended record will be drawn up and sealed accordingly.