23 May 1997
Matthews v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1997] NZACC 104
- Court
- District Court
Appellant failed to prove she altered her position in reliance on the overpayment by entering into binding or irreversible commitments and it was not inequitable to require repayment given ongoing repayments and the independence allowance; therefore remission under s77(2) is not available and the Review Officer's decision stands.