21 Aug 2009
FALOON V COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE HC ROT CIV-2009-470-0319
- Citation
- openlaw-3555dfe9_a511_4b2e_a692_9a8117947b7d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Given the extensive prior litigation and the applicant's demonstrated familiarity with the issues, two months was a reasonable time to reply; the applicant presented a tactical attempt to relitigate long-standing compensation disputes rather than a bona fide need for more time, so the extension was refused and the application dismissed.