24 Jun 2013
CLAYTON v CLAYTON [2013] NZHC 1529
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 1529
- Court
- High Court
The Judge held that leave should be granted on specific issues because they raise bona fide questions of law and fact of sufficient importance (notably the Vaughan Road Trust, valuation issues and dispositions to education trusts), that concurrent factual findings supported adoption of EBITDA $6.7m and a 6.25 multiple such that appeal is arguable, and that some other trust issues were premature or do not meet the Waller v Hider threshold; leave on s182 must be granted by the Court of Appeal and s44C leave was refused but may be considered if s182 leave is granted.