4 Jul 2007
CEO LAND INFORMATION NZ V LUKE, MEDLAND, NISBETT AND CLARK HC AK CIV 2007-404-0057
- Citation
- openlaw-109c3cd6_24e9_4c7e_9098_6f752ad1d1ff.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The appeal was dismissed; although the Crown's grounds were misconceived the Court was not satisfied the appeal was so improper as to justify indemnity (solicitor/client) costs. The respondents were entitled to increased costs: costs for two counsel calculated on category 2B with three days preparation (instead of one) and the resulting amount increased by 50%; disbursements to be fixed by the Registrar if counsel cannot agree.