12 Oct 2007
H W RICHARDSON GROUP LIMITED V MASLIN STEVENSON AND COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS HC INV CIV-2007-425-000573
- Citation
- openlaw-63e30ffe_331e_4214_a753_4526ae114e8e.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Anton Piller order was refused because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate quantified substantial loss and did not provide clear evidence that the respondents intended to destroy or conceal the documents; those deficiencies meant the draconian remedy was not justified.