13 Nov 2020
T (CA376/2020) v C [2020] NZCA 564
- Citation
- [2020] NZCA 564
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court held the High Court Judge's remark that she "likely would have made" a protection order in December 2019 did not amount to a finding that the Family Court's decision was wrong; therefore the proposed second appeal did not raise a question of law capable of bona fide and serious argument and leave to bring a second appeal was declined. The Court admitted T's 14 July 2020 affidavit and respondent's reply affidavit but refused the 25 May 2020 affidavit as adding nothing to the transcript.