12 May 2010
TANIWHA V R SC 16/2010
- Citation
- SC 16/2010
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal dismissed because, even if the phrasing arguably departs from the statutory wording, there was no evidence that the accused's circumstances or characteristics meant the jury could have been misled in a way that affected the verdict; the judge followed the Court of Appeal specimen direction and the issue was therefore moot.